Reduction of unnecessary right ventricular pacing by managed ventricular pacing and search AV+ algorithms in pacemaker patients: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized study.
نویسندگان
چکیده
AIMS The present study was to assess the reduction of right ventricular pacing (RVP) by pacemaker algorithms of Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP) and Search AV+ (SAV+) interval over a period of 12 months. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 385 patients indicated for a dual-chamber pacemaker (DC-PM) were enrolled in the prospective, randomized COMPARE study at 29 centres in China between June 2009 and April 2011. Patients implanted with DC-PMs were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio to the MVP group or the SAV+ group. The percentage of VP (%VP) was obtained from the device diagnostic data at 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups and was expressed as the median %VP over all beats in patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) and atrioventricular block (AVB) excluding persistent third-degree AVB. Of 385 enrolled patients, 253 had SND and 72 had AVB. The %VP in the MVP group was significantly lower than that in the SAV+ group at 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups, respectively. At 12-month follow-up, the median %VP in SND patients was 0.20% in the MVP group and 1.4% in the SAV+ group (P < 0.0001) and the median %VP in AVB patients was 11.8% in the MVP group and 98.1% in the SAV+ group (P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in %VP from 1- to 12-month follow-up. A trend in the correlation between %VP and AT/AF burden was observed. CONCLUSION Over 12-month follow-up, the %VP was lower for MVP than SAV+ in patients with either SND or AVB. The sustainable %VP reduction has potential implications in reducing the development of heart failure and/or atrial arrhythmia morbidity.
منابع مشابه
Difference in percentage of ventricular pacing between two algorithms for minimizing ventricular pacing: results of the IDEAL RVP (Identify the Best Algorithm for Reducing Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing) study
AIMS Managed ventricular pacing (MVP) and Search AV+ are representative dual-chamber pacing algorithms for minimizing ventricular pacing (VP). This randomized, crossover study aimed to examine the difference in ability to reduce percentage of VP (%VP) between these two algorithms. METHODS AND RESULTS Symptomatic bradyarrhythmia patients implanted with a pacemaker equipped with both algorithms...
متن کاملPacemaker Twiddler's Syndrome
A 76-yr-old man with unipolar ventricular pacemaker, previously implanted in the right ventricular apex, presented with syncopal attack and twitching of the right pectoralis muscle. He finally was diagnosed as having Twiddler's syndrome. The patient had a pulse rate of 36/min and cannon waves in the neck veins. Chest radiography showed a dislodged pacing lead completely wrapped around the pulse...
متن کاملEffectiveness of Ventricular Intrinsic Preference (VIP™) and Ventricular AutoCapture (VAC) algorithms in pacemaker patients: Results of the validate study.
BACKGROUND Several past clinical studies have demonstrated that frequent and unnecessary right ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome and compromised atrio-ventricular conduction (AVC) produces long-term adverse effects. The safety and efficacy of two pacemaker algorithms, Ventricular Intrinsic Preference™ (VIP) and Ventricular AutoCapture (VAC), were evaluated in a multi-cente...
متن کاملPacemaker syndrome during managed ventricular pacing mode: what is the mechanism?
A 51-year-old woman underwent implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker 10 years ago, for symptomatic intermittent second-degree type II AV block. She remained free of symptoms during follow-up. Recently, she underwent pacemaker replacement because of battery depletion (Adapta ADDR01, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Given intact AV conduction at the time of intervention, the Managed Ventr...
متن کاملPhysiological pacing: a moving target?
During the 1990s and the early years of the 2000s, there was considerable debate on the advantages of ‘physiological’ pacing, which at that time denoted dual-chamber vs. single-chamber pacing. A series of landmark studies, including the MOST, PASE, CTOPP, and UKPACE trials, randomized patients with various indications for pacing into DDD vs. VVI pacing modes. Despite high hopes and great belief...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
دوره 16 11 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014